Since the test suite runs on both PC and Mac systems, it's one of the few products of this type on the market that allow you to perform accurate cross-platform comparisons. The results are displayed in points (pts), and it goes without saying that the higher the number, the faster your computer's CPU is. The test suite can actually measure systems with well over 200 processor threads. It uses the renowned Cinema 4D rendering package (also famous for its role in the creation of various Hollywood SF or super-hero movies) in order to provide you with a better understanding of your system's general app and OS performance. The scene makes use of various algorithms to stress all the available processor cores. Its basis for these real-world tests is the render of a photorealistic 3D scene. Here's what you need to knowĬinebench is mainly focused on testing the CPU performance of your computer. Marketed as "a real-world cross-platform test suite that evaluates your computer's hardware capabilities," Cinebench is a world-renowned and very popular test suite that has always been close to the hearts of system administrators, hardware journalists that want to be diligent when it comes to their reviews, as well as hardware manufacturers. Take, for example, the situation when you're not particularly interested in your PC's ultimate gaming capabilities, or how it stacks against other similar computers, but with other OSes such as a Mac. While some remarkably comprehensive benchmarking tools do a great job of determining the maximum performance that can be squeezed from a rig, they're not perfect. Working on screenshot for you.Whether you want to brag about owning the biggest, "baddest", and fastest machine out there, or you simply want to determine where your beloved rig stands, there are a lot of awesome benchmarking tools out there.
Memory makes a massive difference with Ryzen, just rna it on my 2700x with 3200mhz cl14 mem and got 3500 and change. Also I could try to use the same speed ram in all to help equalise that also. With more time, I'd set systems to run at fixed clock so there is no ambiguity. The 8086k seems to do a bit too well compared to the others. Speedup from HT/SMT is in ball park of 30%, so similar to R15. Intel CPUs seem to do a bit better here, but I haven't tested for ram scaling at all yet, so that might be a factor where it wasn't really in R15. Ryzen 1600: 1994 (97.7 points per core per GHz) Ryzen 2600: 2912 (all core clock 3.8-ish GHz, dual channel 2666 ram, 127.7 points per core per GHz) Ryzen 1600: 2536 (all core clock 3.4 GHz, dual channel 2933 ram, 124.3 points per core per GHz)
CINEBENCH R20 DOWNLOAD SOFTWARE
Each test was run at least 2 times, the first time observing actual core clocks, 2nd time without monitoring software which generally lead to a small increase in score. Ok, some PRELIMINARY results and analysis.īattle of the 6 cores at my house. Once I get over that hurdle, it's time to get benching!Įdit: direct downloads are now also available:Įdit: Results can be posted in link below.
CINEBENCH R20 DOWNLOAD DOWNLOAD
Unfortunately there doesn't appear to be a standalone download for Windows, and you have to get it through the MS store. This could be better representative of software and hardware looking forward. One area where it has been updated is that it scales to more threads, as well as using newer instructions. To match the latest version of the software, the company has now launched the Cinebench R20 benchmark.Įveryone loves Cinebench R15 right? What could be better than that? I don't know if this is it, but its successor is now available as Cinebench R20. In recent years it has slowly become less relevant, as Maxon has moved through to version 19 and 20 of the software. The latest version has been Cinebench R15, released for version 15 of Cinema 4D. One of the key benchmarks that have been used in the industry is Cinebench.